本文研究2种典型结构形式半潜平台在不同海域结构应力长期分布特征。对比中国南海典型波浪散布与墨西哥湾典型波浪散布特征，计算两海域平台结构应力响应，得到平台结构应力范围长期Weibull分布形状参数。中国南海典型环境条件对于双下浮体式半潜平台结构波浪应力长期Weibull分布形状参数不大于1，对于环形浮箱半潜平台结构波浪应力长期Weibull分布形状参数不大于1.05，为针对中国南海应用简化疲劳分析方法分析半潜式平台结构疲劳寿命提供依据。同时，计算得到两类典型半潜式平台在墨西哥湾典型环境条件下结构波浪应力长期Weibull分布形状参数值不大于0.8的结论，证实对于半潜式平台的疲劳设计，南海疲劳海况较墨西哥湾海况更恶劣。
This paper focus on the long term stress distribution characteristics of two typical semi submersible platform in different sea areas. The typical wave scatter in the South China Sea and the Mexico Gulf are compared. The stress response of the two typical platform structures is calculated, and the long-term Weibull distribution shape parameters of the structure stress range are obtained. For the typical environmental conditions of the South China Sea, the shape parameters of the long-term Weibull distribution for the double pontoon semi submersible platform are not greater than 1, and for the ring pontoon semi submersible platform, the wave stress Weibull shape parameter is not greater than 1.05. This paper provides a basis for the fatigue analysis of semi submersible platform structure by using simplified fatigue analysis method in the South China Sea. At the same time, the two typical semi submersible platform stress long-term shape parameter of Weibull distribution for typical conditions of Mexico Gulf is not greater than 0.8, it confirmed that the China South Sea condition is worse than in the Gulf of Mexico sea for fatigue design of semi submersible platform.
2020,42(4): 131-135 收稿日期：2019-03-22
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2020.04.026
分类号：P752
基金项目：国家重点研发计划课题（2016YFC0303601）；工信部高技术船舶科研项目（K7590）
作者简介：谢文会(1975-)，男，高级工程师，从事深水浮式平台设计与设计理论研究
参考文献：
[1] 谢文会, 谢彬, 等. 深水半潜式钻井平台典型节点谱疲劳分析[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2009, 24(5): 37–43
XIE Wen-hui, XIE Bin et al. Spectral-based fatigue analysis for typical joint of deepwater semi-submersible rig[J]. China Offshore Platform, 2009, 24(5): 37–43
[2] 谢文会, 谢彬. 深水半潜式钻井平台简化疲劳分析[J]. 海洋工程, 2010, 28(2): 28–33
XIE Wen-hui, XIE Bin. Simplified fatigue assessment for deepwater semi-submersible rig[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2010, 28(2): 28–33
[3] 杨鹏, 顾学康. 半潜平台结构疲劳寿命评估方法比较[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2012, 34(8): 112–118
YANG Peng, GU Xue-kang. Comparative researches of structural fatigue life assessment procedures for a semi-submersible platform[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2012, 34(8): 112–118
[4] 崔磊, 何勇, 毛江鸿, 等. 基于裂纹扩展的深水半潜式平台疲劳寿命分析[J]. 船舶力学, 2013, 17(11): 1318–1326
CUI Lei, HE Yong, MAO Jiang-hong, et al. Crack propagation-based fatigue life analysis for deepwater semi-submersible platform[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2013, 17(11): 1318–1326
[5] 余涛, 张日向, 翟钢军. 半潜式平台疲劳损伤分析及延寿评估[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2014, 25(5): 14–20
YU Tao, ZHANG Ri-xiang, ZHAI Gang-jun. The analysis of fatigue of semi-submerged platform and evaluation of prolonged life, China Offshore Platform[J]. 2014, 25(5): 14–20
[6] 谢文会, 谢彬. 深水半潜式钻井平台断裂力学疲劳寿命分析[J]. 船海工程, 2019, 48(1): 127–129
XIE Wen-hui, XIE Bin etc. Fracture mechanics fatigue analysis for deepwater semi-submersible rig[J]. Ship and Ocean Engineering, 2019, 48(1): 127–129
[7] ABS-Commentary on the Guide for the Fatigue Assessment of Offshore Structures[S]. 2004.
[8] ABS-Guide for The Fatigue Assessment of Offshore Structures[S]. 2003.
[9] SCSIO (South China Sea Institute of Oceanology), (2006), Design environmental conditions engineering report for CNOOC[R].
[10] API Derivation of Metocean Design and Operating Conditions[S]. 2014.
